Ss. 9(a) (v) & 10 R/W 14(e)
- Accused had accumulated assets & pecuniary resources beyond known sources of income by misusing his authority but prosecution did not produce any evidence of “misuse of authority”.
- Onus would shift to accused – though mere possession of any pecuniary resources or property by itself not an offence - but there being no known sources of such income – the onus would be on the accused.
Ghani-ur-Rahman Vs. NAB.
PLD 2012 S.C. 64.
Rel:O 2010 SCMR 1697 & PLD 2004 Lah. 155